nesssoli.blogg.se

1. #Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark update
2. #Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark manual
3. #Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark Patch
4. #Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark registration
5. #Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark code

Then, I pushed the changes to the online repository. At that point, there were no local uncommitted changes in the “main” repository. When prompted, I selected to use the local copy of the file (ignoring the changes from the stable branch).Īfter that, I committed the merge to the “main” repository. But it tried to merge the changes from the NEWS file in the stable tree to the NEWS file in the default tree. The merge from the NEWS from stable to NEWS.6 on default went without “complaining”. If I remember correctly, there were conflicts. In the “main” repository, I tried to merge the changes from the stable branch to the default branch. I pushed the changes from that repository to the “main” repository. For that particular change, I used the clone that is usually tracking the stable branch. I cloned that repository to another local repository (or multiple others) were I do the actual changes. I have one “main” repository that I only use for synchronizing changes with the online repository. I’m using Mercurial 5.8 mostly with TortoiseHg as an interface. Update: 1 new changesets, 2 branch heads (merge)

#Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark update

Safe to assume forcing the update should be fine since it didn’t actually make any changes that could conflict?ĮTA: um, maybe not? now i have: $ hg up -checkģ files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved auto : Try to automatically activate bookmarks. Of course now I did a hg pull to grab the latest change and I get: $ hg up Select when TortoiseHg will show a prompt to activate a bookmark when updating to a revision that has one or more bookmarks. Making a couple test changes followed by hg ci / hg export shows I have 2 drafts sitting, but the commit for the NEWS file doesn’t seem to affect anything (doesn’t show up as an edited file, etc. I usually just pull a clean slate, make changes, ci/export a patch, then strip back to latest clean source state for next patch.) $ hg commit Using hg strip to force it back through commits, I go back three to get to a clean state: $ hg strip -f -no-backup -r tipĢ files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolvedĪllow release notes window to be opened from command line Bookmark Allows to manage bookmarks for the selected revision. Tag Allows to manage tags to the selected revision. Opens the TortoiseHg merge dialog with this revision selected.

Merge with local Merge the selected changeset with the Working Dir.

#Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark Patch

Trying to test a patch i get a $ hg patch -no-commit. Open the TortoiseHg dialog to search for similar revisions. GitHub-CI: Decrease time-out for some steps. So we now have the challenge, this is all very possible IMO.When off of an outdated clean state i do a pull/update i get the following: $ hg summ

#Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark registration

Some search, bug reporting and registration interfaces would also be useful. Additional info would be version data I reckon. You could also push back requests and updates for a toolkit.Ī nice user interface for this would be a palette of toolkit repos that you can include into your project and this needn't be much different than the palette view currently available. The VIs will from all the linked repos will be checked out as you would normally checkout a project, but there will be notifications if a toolkit can be updated. So for now let's talk just about a repo and external links to other repos.Ī project will have links to a version of a toolkit, dependency or library (including a hash number for traceability). The presentation that filled me with enthusiasm at CSLUG was given by Greg Payne and he talked about was Git Submodules (SVN External Items may also work).

#Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark manual

#Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark code

But to summarise I expressed the opinion that the current and LabVIEW model for reuse sucked and explained that you can have source-code control where project code is in the repo, but if the dependencies (user lib, instr lib and even unprotected vi lib files) weren't also under source-code control a high-percentage of your code could be modified without control.

If you've not read the aforementioned article I strongly recommend reading it and also all the comments too. Here's a link to his article on the topic I think it might be worth revisiting this and talking about something Greg Payne brought up in CSLUG the other month. 'A Quick Start Guide to TortoiseHg' is available, and it provides a good, basic introduction to basic Mercurial features, as well. (Re-use) Part 1" and amongst the 20 or so people that care about such things it caused a bit of a stir. TortoiseHg is a popular GUI front-end for Mercurial that integrates directly with Windows Explorer (see Figure 3).

Over 4 years and a 100 articles ago I wrote "I'm not being critical but.